<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HTNet &#187; Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heritage-tech.net/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net</link>
	<description>A Notepad of Tech, Business, Science and Self Improvement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Weird Spam Comments</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net/817/weird-spam-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heritage-tech.net/817/weird-spam-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heritage-tech.net/?p=817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past two weeks or so, I&#8217;ve been receiving a lot of (attempted) spam comments with the following format: ceeb423e80bb&#8230; ceeb423e80bb32123aa0&#8230; For the name, it will be the first 10 characters of the seemingly random string (it could even be part of some hash algo like MD5), and it will be linked to a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heritage-tech.net/817/weird-spam-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Splogging Experiment (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net/773/my-splogging-experiment-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heritage-tech.net/773/my-splogging-experiment-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heritage-tech.net/773/my-splogging-experiment-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is a continuation of a previous post; My Splogging Experiment (Part 1). The objective of this experiment is to find out whether splogging is a worthwhile online revenue generation method. If you haven&#8217;t read Part 1 of this experiment, I recommend that you do so before reading the rest of this post. Day [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heritage-tech.net/773/my-splogging-experiment-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Splogging Experiment (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net/772/my-splogging-experiment-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heritage-tech.net/772/my-splogging-experiment-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 02:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heritage-tech.net/772/my-splogging-experiment-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been wondering why splogging (spam blogging) is becoming more prevalent nowadays. The first thing I suspected was it must surely be profitable monetary wise. Why else would anyone hop on the splogging bandwagon if it wasn&#8217;t for the money? Rather than just wonder about it, I decided to give it a try. I created [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heritage-tech.net/772/my-splogging-experiment-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mailing Lists: Spambait Or Useful Information Resource?</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net/758/mailing-lists-spambait-or-useful-information-resource/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heritage-tech.net/758/mailing-lists-spambait-or-useful-information-resource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heritage-tech.net/758/mailing-lists-spambait-or-useful-information-resource/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re confused by the title, let me just clarify; I&#8217;m referring to mailing lists of the electronic kind (ie. email mailing lists). Typically, this means subscribing to an email newsletter of some sort. I still subscribe to a few mailing lists. Nevertheless, if I were to be given RSS subscription options then I would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heritage-tech.net/758/mailing-lists-spambait-or-useful-information-resource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Irrelevant Sponsored Links Are Evil</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net/613/why-irrelevant-sponsored-links-are-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heritage-tech.net/613/why-irrelevant-sponsored-links-are-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heritage-tech.net/613/why-irrelevant-sponsored-links-are-evil/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been seeing more and more irrelevant sponsored links in the blogosphere. In fact, I think the situation&#8217;s getting worse every passing day. Nothing kills my interest in a post more quickly than seeing an irrelevant sponsored link in the body of the post. There are three reasons why I think irrelevant sponsored links are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heritage-tech.net/613/why-irrelevant-sponsored-links-are-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam Increasing But Generating Less Noise</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net/472/spam-increasing-but-generating-less-noise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heritage-tech.net/472/spam-increasing-but-generating-less-noise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 04:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heritage-tech.net/472/spam-increasing-but-generating-less-noise/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As spam becomes more and more prevalent, Americans are starting to accept them as a fact of life and just move on, according to a survey conducted by the Pew Internet and American Life Project: Thirty-seven percent of U.S. e-mail users say they are getting more junk in their personal e-mail accounts, and 29 percent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heritage-tech.net/472/spam-increasing-but-generating-less-noise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

