<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HTNet &#187; Text-Link-Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heritage-tech.net/tag/text-link-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net</link>
	<description>A Notepad of Tech, Business, Science and Self Improvement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google PageRank Updated Again</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net/666/google-pagerank-updated-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heritage-tech.net/666/google-pagerank-updated-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Text-Link-Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heritage-tech.net/666/google-pagerank-updated-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow&#8230; somebody sure is taking this paid links jihad very seriously. Google has again reduced the PageRank values of various sites. The main suspected reason for this seems to lean heavily on selling Text-Link-Ads. Mind you this is just a theory at the moment&#8230; Google is taking the approach of keeping quiet for now. Some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heritage-tech.net/666/google-pagerank-updated-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Text-Link-Ads.com Know Something Their Publishers Don&#8217;t?</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage-tech.net/600/does-text-link-adscom-know-something-their-publishers-dont/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heritage-tech.net/600/does-text-link-adscom-know-something-their-publishers-dont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Text-Link-Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heritage-tech.net/600/does-text-link-adscom-know-something-their-publishers-dont/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, TLA has been sending out emails to publishers notifying them of changes to their affiliate URLs. Apparently TLA is now using TinyURL&#8217;s redirecting service to replace their direct affiliate links. According to the email, the reason for these changes are: To shorten the referral URL To secure the affiliate link Personally, I find the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heritage-tech.net/600/does-text-link-adscom-know-something-their-publishers-dont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

